Justice Under Siege: Why Nigeria's Judicial System Must Stand Against IPOB's Proscription

 

Justice Under Siege: Why Nigeria's Judicial System Must Stand Against IPOB's Proscription 

■ Writer: Ezekwereogu Odinaka

■ Twitter:@umuchiukwu

■ 03.02.2025

The Nigerian judicial system is at a critical juncture, faced with the daunting task of upholding justice and protecting human rights. 

The proscription of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist organization is a contentious issue that has sparked heated debates and raised concerns about the erosion of fundamental freedoms. The Illegality Of Proscription The Enugu State High Court has already ruled that the proscription of IPOB by the South-East Governors' Forum in 2017 was illegal, unconstitutional, and null and void. This landmark judgment underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens. 

The judicial system must ensure that any actions taken by the government or other authorities are in line with the Constitution and do not infringe on individual liberties. The Right To Self-Determination IPOB's leader, Nnamdi Kanu, has argued that the organization is advocating for the right to self-determination, which is a fundamental human right. The judicial system must recognise and protect this right, rather than labelling it as a terrorist activity. By doing so, the judiciary can promote peaceful resolution of conflicts and prevent the escalation of violence. 

The Dangers Of Labeling Labeling IPOB as a terrorist organization can have far-reaching consequences, including the erosion of trust in the government and the judicial system. It can also lead to the marginalization of certain groups and the perpetuation of violence. The judicial system must exercise caution and ensure that any labelling or proscription is based on credible evidence and is in line with international human rights standards. 

International Implications. The proscription of IPOB has also raised concerns internationally, with many organizations and countries expressing concerns about the erosion of human rights in Nigeria. The judicial system must take into account these international implications and ensure that its decisions are in line with international human rights law. The Way Forward. 

The Nigerian judicial system has a critical role to play in promoting justice, protecting human rights, and upholding the rule of law. In the case of IPOB, the judiciary must: 1. Uphold the rule of law: Ensure that any actions taken by the government or other authorities are in line with the constitution and do not infringe on individual liberties. 2. Protect human rights: Recognize and protect the right to self-determination and other fundamental human rights. 

3. Promote peaceful resolution: Encourage peaceful resolution of conflicts and prevent the escalation of violence. 4. Ensure transparency and accountability: Ensure that all decisions and actions are transparent and accountable to the public. By taking these steps, the Nigerian judicial system can demonstrate its commitment to justice, human rights, and the rule of law. 

Edited By Aguocha Chinwendum 

Published By Umuchiukwu Writers